« Social search still doesn't make much sense. | Main | Words to live by. »

Leave my internet alone.

Professor Michael Geist notes that the Quebec recording industry, among others, wants Canadian content prioritized on the internet:

Second, it would like the CRTC to require ISPs to prioritize Canadian content, noting that if ISPs prioritize content for commercial purposes (ie. non-net neutrality) then they can be required to do something similar to advance Canadian culture. ADISQ is not alone on this one - a growing number of cultural groups want the CRTC to re-examine the new media exception and to consider rules that bring cancon-like requirements to the Internet.

Living in Canada, I am forced to listen to a certain percentage of Canadian music on the radio, which means that certain Canadian songs are played over and over to meet that quota.

Any television show that is simulcast on a Canadian network is automatically switched to on the cable network, meaning that I am forced to watch Canadian commercials - even during the SuperBowl.

I can only buy satellite service from a Canadian company. It is illegal to subscribe to DirecTV.

All television stations in Canada must be approved by the CRTC. The seemingly infinite selection of digital cable channels end up showing a lot of 20 year old Canadian television series. I pay for a movie channel that broadcasts a huge percentage of bad Canadian movies.

I am forced on my cable system to pay for channels like APTV - the Aboriginal People's Television Network. Fortunately, they actually occasionally have good movies which have little to do with aboriginal people.

My tax dollars also subsidize all of this largesse, including an entire network called the CBC. Though the odd good show like Corner Gas does occasionally appear.

If content is good it will survive. If not, then it shouldn't be rammed down people's throats.

So as a beaten down and ignored consumer I beg you, leave my internet alone.

Powered by Bleezer

Comments

I definitely agree, I want the CRTC to have nothing to do with the internet, If I want canadian content, I'll get it myself. I shoudln't be forced to view it.

And you tax dollars don't pay for Corner Gas, It's a CTV show, http://www.cornergas.com/

Posted by: William Spaetzel on November 1, 2007 08:56 PM

That's EXACTLY how I feel as a viewer... and as a content creator, I want to make it big by my own right, not because people were forced to watch me. Well written, Larry.

Posted by: Casey McKinnon on November 2, 2007 04:07 PM

Corner Gas kind of sucks, IMHO. I don't watch a lot of TV, mind, but if stupid puns and hammy acting pass for quality television then this country's worse off than I'd thought. And I disagree that good content alone will prevail when there's an American market many, many times the size of ours. It's not a content problem; it's a numbers problem.

However, I will agree with you that the CanCon system is a wrong, boneheaded approach. Forcing broadcasters to play a certain percentage of Canadian music means that they will play the same, old boring (but proven) stuff over and over again. I recall flipping through some Edmonton radio stations and hearing the same two Tragically Hip songs on all of them. "Oh, CanCon time, I guess," I thought. Not that there's anything wrong with the Hip, but there's more to Canadian content then that. I'd much rather see a beefed up grants system that allowed emerging Canadian artists to reach the public and more funding for festivals and other collaborative ventures that give Canadians opportunities to hear our own stories amidst all the American content streaming over. I'd pay higher taxes for that happily, because, a) it provides opportunities rather than forcing someone to listen and b) it won't allow broadcasters (or anyone) to meet CanCon requirements by choosing the lowest common denominator all the time. (Bryan Adams hasn't put out an album with anything new on it in years - plenty of new Canadian bands have!)

Posted by: Kuri on November 3, 2007 09:01 AM

If you don't like that system, you just have to move some miles wouthwards. There you don't have to pay for subsidized cultural industries, though you do for other colonial items.

Do you really think that is a matter of market-lead industry? that if content is good it will survive? I thought it was teached in the first day of marketing classes.

Pep.

Posted by: pep on November 5, 2007 03:04 AM

I'm not sure you understand the proposal. This has nothing to do with content, but with delivery of data. The only information the ISP has when routing packets is the origin and destination of the packet. These people are saying that a packet that is sent from Canada to another place in Canada should have a higher priority (that is, be delayed less by other traffic) than foreign traffic.

Traffic shaping has nothing to do with content. I'm not saying its a good idea, just that you're letting your insecurities show by railing against phantoms.

Posted by: Geekwad on November 5, 2007 10:32 AM

It is illegal to subscribe to DirecTV.

That's not strictly true, AFAIK. DirecTV isn't allowed to sell to a Canadian, but a Canadian is allowed to deal with DirecTV. The end result may be about the same, but there's still a difference there. It allows for some leeway. For instance, if you were also a legal US resident and used that as the billing address, you could probably legally use your DirecTV dish in Canada...

Posted by: Frank Boyle on November 6, 2007 02:25 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Blogmap

Blogroll

Filangy WebMarks