<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Setting limits.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larryborsato.com/blog/2006/03/setting-limits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larryborsato.com/blog/2006/03/setting-limits/</link>
	<description>Unpredictable. Unfocused. Just like life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:40:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://larryborsato.com/blog/2006/03/setting-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 04:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alchemii.net/blog/2006/03/setting-limits/#comment-410</guid>
		<description>
I agree with you that people need more common sense; certainly the ones with automatic-litigation-response reflexes do. So I won&#039;t defend their behavior.

However, on an iPod, I can see why an volume limit setting would be a good idea. I certainly have a very eclectic collection of music. And when the iPod is on shuffle mode, I could easily go from a quiet Debussy piano piece, which I might have to increase the volume on while I&#039;m on the train, to a screaming Nine Inch Nails track, which would have to be turned down. Even if I resort to ripping the headphone buds out of my ear (that hurts, BTW), there&#039;s still a second or two where my eardrums have been punished.

I do NOT want volume compression (also known as Automatic Volume Leveling) because it tends to ruin the finer points of good music, and because it also takes a half-second or two to kick in. So I thing the Volume Limit is a good idea.

Or think of it this way. Whether Apple adds that feature or not, the automatic-litigation-responders aren&#039;t going away. And you don&#039;t have to turn it on if you don&#039;t want it. And I don&#039;t see it dramatically affecting the price of an iPod anyway.

There&#039;s my $1/50,
-&gt;A
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that people need more common sense; certainly the ones with automatic-litigation-response reflexes do. So I won&#8217;t defend their behavior.</p>
<p>However, on an iPod, I can see why an volume limit setting would be a good idea. I certainly have a very eclectic collection of music. And when the iPod is on shuffle mode, I could easily go from a quiet Debussy piano piece, which I might have to increase the volume on while I&#8217;m on the train, to a screaming Nine Inch Nails track, which would have to be turned down. Even if I resort to ripping the headphone buds out of my ear (that hurts, BTW), there&#8217;s still a second or two where my eardrums have been punished.</p>
<p>I do NOT want volume compression (also known as Automatic Volume Leveling) because it tends to ruin the finer points of good music, and because it also takes a half-second or two to kick in. So I thing the Volume Limit is a good idea.</p>
<p>Or think of it this way. Whether Apple adds that feature or not, the automatic-litigation-responders aren&#8217;t going away. And you don&#8217;t have to turn it on if you don&#8217;t want it. And I don&#8217;t see it dramatically affecting the price of an iPod anyway.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s my $1/50,<br />
->A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
